IPv6 Excuse Bingo

Did you mean IPTV? NAT444 is fine We've still got plenty of IPv4 IPv6 addresses are too long to remember It'll make it easier for the government to track me
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? Azure doesn't support it IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing
Our vendor doesn't support it We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 It's not mature enough It's on our roadmap It'll break our GeoIP
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load IPv6 is slower than IPv4 Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses