| NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
There's no certification track |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
| Larger headers are less efficient |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
| IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
 |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
| No one else has deployed it |
We don't need that many addresses |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
It'll break our GeoIP |
It's on our roadmap |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
It's too hard to support |
Made with excuses from