| It's too hard to support |
We can use RFC6598 |
Vendor bugs |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
IPv6 is a security risk |
| We don't need that many addresses |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
| It's not mature enough |
NAT444 is fine |
 |
Hex is hard |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
What's IPv6? |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
It's on our roadmap |
| It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
It's too complicated |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
Made with excuses from