IPv6 Excuse Bingo

Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year It's on our roadmap AWS doesn't support it Larger headers are less efficient
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? We can use RFC6598 Our vendor doesn't support it It's not supported by Google Compute
It'll make it easier for the government to track me We don't need that many addresses We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC IPv6 is just a fad
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks IPv6 is a security risk IPv6 is slower than IPv4 We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet
We don't have a lab to test it It's not mature enough It'll break our GeoIP NAT444 is fine We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses