IPv6 Excuse Bingo

There's no certification track It's too complicated We don't need that many addresses IPv6 just isn't a priority It's on our roadmap
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? Did you mean IPTV? What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? AWS doesn't support it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet We've still got plenty of IPv4 It'll break our GeoIP
It's not mature enough IPv6 is a security risk Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet We don't have a lab to test it We can use RFC6598
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load No one else has deployed it It's too hard to support It'll make it easier for the government to track me NAT444 is fine
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses