| We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
Larger headers are less efficient |
| Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
 |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
| No one else has deployed it |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
It's not mature enough |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
It's on our roadmap |
| We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
IPv6 is a security risk |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
Made with excuses from