IPv6 Excuse Bingo

It'll make it easier for the government to track me Vendor bugs I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT IPv6 is slower than IPv4 Hex is hard
Our vendor doesn't support it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it IPv6 addresses are too long to remember Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles We don't need that many addresses
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 We've still got plenty of IPv4 We can use RFC6598 It's not supported by Google Compute
IPv6 is a security risk Larger headers are less efficient End users don't care about IPv6 My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD.
IPv6 just isn't a priority Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? Azure doesn't support it We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple We don't have a lab to test it
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses