IPv6 Excuse Bingo

There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple It'll make it easier for the government to track me End users don't care about IPv6 Vendor bugs
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? IPv6 just isn't a priority Did you mean IPTV? Azure doesn't support it Larger headers are less efficient
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet NAT444 is fine Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets?
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year We don't need that many addresses We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it It's too complicated
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet IPv6 addresses are too long to remember My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 We can use RFC6598
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses