| NAT444 is fine |
It'll break our GeoIP |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
It's too hard to support |
Did you mean IPTV? |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
| We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
 |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Vendor bugs |
| Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
We don't need that many addresses |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
There's no certification track |
| We don't have a lab to test it |
It's on our roadmap |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Azure doesn't support it |
Made with excuses from