| None of our customers want it |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
| IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
 |
We don't need that many addresses |
It's on our roadmap |
| It's not mature enough |
It's too hard to support |
What's IPv6? |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
| We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
Hex is hard |
Made with excuses from