IPv6 Excuse Bingo

Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT IPv6 addresses are too long to remember It'll make it easier for the government to track me What's IPv6?
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles It's not supported by Google Compute No one else has deployed it We've still got plenty of IPv4 Our vendor doesn't support it
It's too complicated NAT444 is fine Azure doesn't support it Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet We can use RFC6598
IPv6 is a security risk It's too hard to support Larger headers are less efficient We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses