| It's too complicated |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
It's on our roadmap |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
It's too hard to support |
| I don't want to expose my MAC address |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
| NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
 |
We don't need that many addresses |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
| It's not mature enough |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
IPv6 is a security risk |
Azure doesn't support it |
AWS doesn't support it |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
Made with excuses from