| We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 is just a fad |
None of our customers want it |
IPv6 is a security risk |
| No one else has deployed it |
AWS doesn't support it |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Vendor bugs |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
We don't have a lab to test it |
 |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
What's IPv6? |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
Larger headers are less efficient |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
We don't need that many addresses |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
Made with excuses from