IPv6 Excuse Bingo

Did you mean IPTV? IPv6 just isn't a priority We don't need that many addresses IPv6 addresses are too long to remember Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet
It's too complicated NAT444 is fine We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. Github doesn't support IPv6 Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6
It's not mature enough Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? We can use RFC6598 We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year
IPv6 is just a fad Our vendor doesn't support it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it It's on our roadmap I don't want to expose my MAC address
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? End users don't care about IPv6 I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Android doesn't support DHCPv6
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses