| It's on our roadmap |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
It's too hard to support |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
None of our customers want it |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
| We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
 |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
| Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
We can use RFC6598 |
Azure doesn't support it |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
| IPv6 is a security risk |
It'll break our GeoIP |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
It's not mature enough |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
Made with excuses from