| None of our customers want it |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
| We don't have a lab to test it |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
We can use RFC6598 |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
| We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
 |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| Larger headers are less efficient |
IPv6 is a security risk |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
It's too complicated |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Made with excuses from