| It's too hard to support |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
No one else has deployed it |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
Larger headers are less efficient |
We don't need that many addresses |
We can use RFC6598 |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
| IPv6 is a security risk |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
 |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| It's on our roadmap |
Did you mean IPTV? |
Hex is hard |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
NAT444 is fine |
| What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
What's IPv6? |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
Made with excuses from