| We don't need that many addresses |
NAT444 is fine |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
Did you mean IPTV? |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
| We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
 |
Vendor bugs |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
| Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
There's no certification track |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
Larger headers are less efficient |
Made with excuses from