| We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
No one else has deployed it |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
Hex is hard |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
We can use RFC6598 |
| It's on our roadmap |
None of our customers want it |
 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
Larger headers are less efficient |
| We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
It's too hard to support |
We don't need that many addresses |
There's no certification track |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
| We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
We don't have a lab to test it |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
Made with excuses from