| We can use RFC6598 |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
It's too hard to support |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
| We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
NAT444 is fine |
Vendor bugs |
It's too complicated |
| I don't want to expose my MAC address |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
 |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
| We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
IPv6 is a security risk |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
| We don't need that many addresses |
It's on our roadmap |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
Made with excuses from