IPv6 Excuse Bingo

There's no certification track There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks
We don't need that many addresses Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles Android doesn't support DHCPv6 We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load
It'll break our GeoIP NAT444 is fine Larger headers are less efficient IPv6 addresses are too long to remember
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud End users don't care about IPv6 Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet
Github doesn't support IPv6 We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 Vendor bugs It's on our roadmap
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses