| Larger headers are less efficient |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
NAT444 is fine |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
| We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We don't need that many addresses |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
| End users don't care about IPv6 |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
 |
It's too hard to support |
What's IPv6? |
| Azure doesn't support it |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
It's on our roadmap |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
| AWS doesn't support it |
There's no certification track |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
Did you mean IPTV? |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Made with excuses from