| NAT444 is fine |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
AWS doesn't support it |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
| We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
We can use RFC6598 |
We don't need that many addresses |
Larger headers are less efficient |
| Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
IPv6 is just a fad |
 |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
What's IPv6? |
| It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
We don't have a lab to test it |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
Azure doesn't support it |
It's too hard to support |
No one else has deployed it |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
Made with excuses from