| It'll break our GeoIP |
Larger headers are less efficient |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
| IPv6 is just a fad |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
Hex is hard |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
| Did you mean IPTV? |
It's on our roadmap |
 |
NAT444 is fine |
It's not mature enough |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
| Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
What's IPv6? |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
AWS doesn't support it |
Made with excuses from