IPv6 Excuse Bingo

IPv6 addresses are too long to remember Our vendor doesn't support it Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. Larger headers are less efficient
IPv6 is just a fad I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks We don't need that many addresses I don't want to expose my MAC address
It'll make it easier for the government to track me Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC It's too hard to support
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet What's IPv6? IPv6 is slower than IPv4 No one else has deployed it Android doesn't support DHCPv6
AWS doesn't support it We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing NAT444 is fine Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses?
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses