| IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
We don't have a lab to test it |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
AWS doesn't support it |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
| IPv6 just isn't a priority |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
Did you mean IPTV? |
NAT444 is fine |
| Larger headers are less efficient |
Vendor bugs |
 |
We don't need that many addresses |
There's no certification track |
| It's not supported by Google Compute |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Made with excuses from