| It'll break our GeoIP |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
We don't need that many addresses |
| Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
We don't have a lab to test it |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
NAT444 is fine |
| Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
 |
AWS doesn't support it |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
| Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
Vendor bugs |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
It's too hard to support |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
Made with excuses from