| Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
None of our customers want it |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
It's not mature enough |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
| Larger headers are less efficient |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
 |
What's IPv6? |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
| Vendor bugs |
It'll break our GeoIP |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
NAT444 is fine |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
It's on our roadmap |
We can use RFC6598 |
Made with excuses from