| It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
Vendor bugs |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Hex is hard |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
We don't need that many addresses |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
 |
We can use RFC6598 |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
| IPv6 is a security risk |
Larger headers are less efficient |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
| IPv6 just isn't a priority |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
Azure doesn't support it |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
We don't have a lab to test it |
Made with excuses from