IPv6 Excuse Bingo

NAT444 is fine Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet There's no certification track Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks IPv6 just isn't a priority
Azure doesn't support it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it No one else has deployed it What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? It'll make it easier for the government to track me
Larger headers are less efficient IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud End users don't care about IPv6 IPv6 is a security risk
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing Github doesn't support IPv6 It's not supported by Google Compute I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT We don't need that many addresses
It'll break our GeoIP We don't have a lab to test it It's on our roadmap It's not mature enough My transit provider doesn't support IPv6
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses