IPv6 Excuse Bingo

None of our customers want it Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks No one else has deployed it We can use RFC6598 We don't have a lab to test it
It's too hard to support It's not supported by Google Compute IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud Azure doesn't support it I don't want to expose my MAC address
Hex is hard Android doesn't support DHCPv6 We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year IPv6 is a security risk
NAT444 is fine What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? We don't need that many addresses Larger headers are less efficient There's no ROI on deploying IPv6
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. End users don't care about IPv6 Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? It's too complicated
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses