IPv6 Excuse Bingo

My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 It's too complicated We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it IPv6 just isn't a priority
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year Github doesn't support IPv6 IPv6 is just a fad We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. I don't want to expose my MAC address
End users don't care about IPv6 Our vendor doesn't support it We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP AWS doesn't support it
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load It's too hard to support
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles Larger headers are less efficient It's not mature enough It'll break our GeoIP
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses