IPv6 Excuse Bingo

IPv6 addresses are too long to remember NAT444 is fine It's too hard to support We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet
It'll make it easier for the government to track me Our vendor doesn't support it It's too complicated I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT It's not supported by Google Compute
We don't have a lab to test it Did you mean IPTV? We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC Hex is hard
No one else has deployed it It's on our roadmap My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 IPv6 is slower than IPv4 What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets?
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? None of our customers want it Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks AWS doesn't support it Larger headers are less efficient
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses