IPv6 Excuse Bingo

I don't want to expose my MAC address It's not supported by Google Compute IPv6 addresses are too long to remember Our vendor doesn't support it None of our customers want it
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 IPv6 is slower than IPv4 Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? Did you mean IPTV? We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP
Github doesn't support IPv6 Vendor bugs IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet There's no ROI on deploying IPv6
We don't need that many addresses Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load It's on our roadmap Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 It's too hard to support
It'll make it easier for the government to track me I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks Larger headers are less efficient NAT444 is fine
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses