IPv6 Excuse Bingo

We don't need that many addresses We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC It'll make it easier for the government to track me Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks IPv6 just isn't a priority
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. It's on our roadmap There's no certification track Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing Vendor bugs
NAT444 is fine End users don't care about IPv6 It's not supported by Google Compute Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet
Did you mean IPTV? IPv6 is a security risk What's IPv6? I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud Larger headers are less efficient It's too complicated IPv6 addresses are too long to remember
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses