| IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
No one else has deployed it |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
We can use RFC6598 |
| IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
NAT444 is fine |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
Azure doesn't support it |
 |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
| We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
It's on our roadmap |
| We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We don't have a lab to test it |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
Made with excuses from