IPv6 Excuse Bingo

We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet It's on our roadmap I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT Github doesn't support IPv6
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it No one else has deployed it It'll make it easier for the government to track me It's too hard to support
Larger headers are less efficient We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. We don't need that many addresses Vendor bugs
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks It's too complicated IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud Hex is hard We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember It'll break our GeoIP It's not mature enough NAT444 is fine IPv6 is a security risk
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses