| There's no certification track |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
| We don't need that many addresses |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
NAT444 is fine |
 |
Larger headers are less efficient |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
| IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
Vendor bugs |
It's on our roadmap |
Made with excuses from