| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
It's on our roadmap |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
| It's too hard to support |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
Hex is hard |
| What's IPv6? |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
 |
Azure doesn't support it |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
| We can use RFC6598 |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
AWS doesn't support it |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We don't need that many addresses |
| It'll break our GeoIP |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Vendor bugs |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
Made with excuses from