| Did you mean IPTV? |
NAT444 is fine |
We don't need that many addresses |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
It's too complicated |
| We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
| IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
 |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
| It's not mature enough |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
No one else has deployed it |
It'll break our GeoIP |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
| Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
Azure doesn't support it |
None of our customers want it |
Made with excuses from