| IPv6 is just a fad |
It's too complicated |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
No one else has deployed it |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
| It's not mature enough |
NAT444 is fine |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
It'll break our GeoIP |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
| Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
 |
None of our customers want it |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
| It's on our roadmap |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
Did you mean IPTV? |
| We don't need that many addresses |
We can use RFC6598 |
IPv6 just isn't a priority |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We don't have a lab to test it |
Made with excuses from