| Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
No one else has deployed it |
None of our customers want it |
| We don't have a lab to test it |
We can use RFC6598 |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
It'll break our GeoIP |
It's too hard to support |
| Our vendor doesn't support it |
We don't need that many addresses |
 |
AWS doesn't support it |
Vendor bugs |
| IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
| What's IPv6? |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Made with excuses from