IPv6 Excuse Bingo

I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT IPv6 is a security risk NAT444 is fine Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6
It'll make it easier for the government to track me Larger headers are less efficient Vendor bugs Github doesn't support IPv6
It's too hard to support We don't need that many addresses IPv6 addresses are too long to remember What's IPv6?
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it It's too complicated None of our customers want it We've still got plenty of IPv4
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses