| Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
What's IPv6? |
| Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
No one else has deployed it |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
| It's too complicated |
NAT444 is fine |
 |
Azure doesn't support it |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
| IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
We can use RFC6598 |
| IPv6 is a security risk |
It's too hard to support |
Larger headers are less efficient |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
Made with excuses from