IPv6 Excuse Bingo

We can use RFC6598 Larger headers are less efficient Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet
We don't need that many addresses Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? IPv6 is just a fad Did you mean IPTV? Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing
It's on our roadmap Our vendor doesn't support it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud IPv6 addresses are too long to remember We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC Android doesn't support DHCPv6 We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year
IPv6 just isn't a priority Github doesn't support IPv6 It'll make it easier for the government to track me AWS doesn't support it NAT444 is fine
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses