| IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
NAT444 is fine |
We don't need that many addresses |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
| IPv6 just isn't a priority |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Azure doesn't support it |
| We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
 |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
We can use RFC6598 |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
No one else has deployed it |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
It's not mature enough |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
| IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
We don't have a lab to test it |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
Made with excuses from