| We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
It's too hard to support |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
| We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
We can use RFC6598 |
What's IPv6? |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
We don't need that many addresses |
| IPv6 is just a fad |
None of our customers want it |
 |
Vendor bugs |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
| Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
It'll break our GeoIP |
Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? |
No one else has deployed it |
It's too complicated |
| Larger headers are less efficient |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
NAT444 is fine |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
Made with excuses from