| What's IPv6? |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
| My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
IPv6 is a security risk |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
No one else has deployed it |
| We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
It'll break our GeoIP |
 |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
It's too complicated |
| NAT444 is fine |
It's too hard to support |
We can use RFC6598 |
It's not mature enough |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
| None of our customers want it |
IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
Made with excuses from