| AWS doesn't support it |
It's too complicated |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
It's on our roadmap |
| IPv6 just isn't a priority |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
NAT444 is fine |
It's too hard to support |
| It's not mature enough |
Larger headers are less efficient |
 |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
| It's not supported by Google Compute |
End users don't care about IPv6 |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
There's no certification track |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
| Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks |
It'll break our GeoIP |
IPv6 is a security risk |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
Made with excuses from