IPv6 Excuse Bingo

NAT444 is fine It's too complicated Can't we just buy more IPv4 addresses? Vendor bugs It's on our roadmap
We don't have a lab to test it We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it IPv6 isn't an Internet Standard yet It's too hard to support I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT
There's no certification track Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 Android doesn't support DHCPv6 End users don't care about IPv6
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet It's not supported by Google Compute Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD.
Too many people have broken IPv6 stacks IPv6 just isn't a priority None of our customers want it AWS doesn't support it We can use RFC6598
Made with excuses from ipv6excuses.com
Suggest a new excuse: Tweet to @ipv6excuses