| It'll break our GeoIP |
NAT444 is fine |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
Our Lawful Intercept doesn't support IPv6 yet |
| I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
AWS doesn't support it |
It's on our roadmap |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
| IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
No one else has deployed it |
 |
IPv6 is just a fad |
Our vendor doesn't support it |
| IPv6 just isn't a priority |
It's too complicated |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
Our business intelligence team can't even parse IPv4 logfiles |
| There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
Larger headers are less efficient |
IPv6 addresses are too long to remember |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
Made with excuses from