I don't want to lose the security provided by NAT |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
NAT444 is fine |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
None of our customers want it |
Github doesn't support IPv6 |
Those stupid Privacy Extension addresses keep changing |
We have no roadmap for native IPv6 as we rolled out 6RD. |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
Our DDOS mitigation platform can't monitor IPv6 |
It'll break our GeoIP |
 |
We forgot to include IPv6 in our last RFP |
No one else has deployed it |
Did you mean IPTV? |
There's no certification track |
Our Dynamic DNS doesn't support it |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
It'll make it easier for the government to track me |
I don't want to expose my MAC address |
It's not supported by Google Compute |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
We can use RFC6598 |
There's no ROI on deploying IPv6 |
Made with excuses from