| IPv6 is a security risk |
We can use RFC6598 |
We would have to rewrite our entire application to support it |
My transit provider doesn't support IPv6 |
We'll deploy IPv6 next financial year |
| Azure doesn't support it |
Vendor bugs |
We don't have a lab to test it |
There's no certification track |
Android doesn't support DHCPv6 |
| It's not supported by Google Compute |
Larger headers are less efficient |
 |
We don't need that many addresses |
What do you mean I have to wrap an IP in square brackets? |
| It's not mature enough |
IPv6 is slower than IPv4 |
None of our customers want it |
IPv6 isn't supported by OVH Cloud |
Our recursive DNS can't handle the extra load |
| Github doesn't support IPv6 |
What's IPv6? |
We've still got plenty of IPv4 |
We have IPv6, but we just want to keep things simple |
We'll deploy IPv6 right after we deploy DNSSEC |
Made with excuses from